By Jim Garamone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity
WASHINGTON, July 17, 2014 – America expects its Marine Corps
to be second to none, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. told the Senate Armed Services
Committee today, and if he’s confirmed as the service’s next commandant, he
vowed, the Marine Corps would continue to live up to that expectation.
Dunford, currently the commander of NATO’s International
Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, would succeed Gen. James F. Amos as
Marine Corps commandant if the Senate confirms his nomination. The commandant
also serves as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The Marine Corps is the smallest armed service in the
Defense Department and serves as a naval expeditionary force in readiness,
Dunford said. “You expect your Marines to demonstrate courage, honor and
commitment,” he added. “You expect a lot of your Marines, and you should.”
If confirmed, Dunford said, “I will ensure that Marines
continue to meet your expectations and the expectations of the American
people.”
The confirmation hearing was friendly, and many senators
praised Dunford’s work in Afghanistan. The majority of the senators’ questions
were about Afghanistan, and that country was also on the general’s mind.
“I’d also like to recognize the 1,817 Americans who have
made the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan and the nearly 20,000 who have been
wounded,” he said. “Each day, the men and women of the United States forces in
Afghanistan work to bring meaning to their sacrifice.”
When Dunford took command in Afghanistan 18 months ago, more
than 100,000 American service members were in the country. Today, that number
is 30,000, and it’s due to drop to 9,800 by the end of the year. “I think one
of the most significant outcomes of our time in Afghanistan has been that we
put pressure on the terrorist networks and al-Qaida and prevented another
9/11,” the general said.
As the numbers of coalition and partner troops declined, the
security situation in the country actually improved, the general said,
crediting the development of capable and credible Afghan forces. “In 2002,
there were no effective Afghan security forces,” he said. “There is today an
army and a police force of over 352,000, as well as another 30,000 Afghan local
police that are capable of providing security to the Afghan people.”
Afghan forces gave the Afghan people the security needed to
conduct elections in April and June, he noted. That security has also provided
other signs of progress in the nation, he said. “We have, today, over 8 million
children in school -- 2 million of those, young girls,” Dunford said.
Advances in health care, communications and road networks
also have taken place, the general told the senators. “But I would say that the
most profound thing that exists in Afghanistan today that didn’t exist in 2001
is hope,” he added. “The Afghan people actually have hope and confidence in the
future that didn’t exist under the oppression and the tyranny of the Taliban in
2001.”
Dunford said he agrees with President Barack Obama’s
decision to draw down U.S. forces to 9,800 through the end of the year. The
president’s plan calls on U.S. force levels then to be reduced by half at the
end of 2015, and essentially having a military presence only in the U.S.
Embassy by 2017.
Post-2014, U.S. forces will be on the ground to conduct
counterterrorism operations and to train, advise and assist Afghan forces,
Dunford said. These plans still must constantly be validated, he added, and if
the assumptions underlying these recommendations change, then the plan itself
must.
One of his assumptions is that the full 9,800 Americans
would be in Afghanistan through the end of the 2015 fighting season, the
general told the committee. Other critical assumptions include the
counterterrorism capability and the will of Afghan forces, as well as the
nature of the threat.
“The counterterrorism capacity and the will of Pakistan also
need to be considered,” he said. “The quality of political transition that
we’re in the midst of has to be considered.
Finally, the international community’s support and
commitment in support of the NATO mission has to be considered, he said.
“I think all of those are variables that would have to be
considered when determining the adequacy of our force levels in the future,” he
told the Senate panel.
No military leader has recommended that the United States
draw down to zero troops in Afghanistan by 2017, Dunford said. “Every military
leader would want to have the conditions on the ground and the assumptions be
revalidated as a transition takes place,” he added.
Dunford also addressed a number of other topics, including:
-- The balance between readiness and modernization;
-- The effect of sequestration spending cuts on the force;
-- The lessons of Iraq for Afghanistan; and
-- The importance of Pakistan to stability in Central and
South Asia.
Dunford also pledged to continue efforts to eradicate sexual
assault In the Marine Corps.
“So the effect that we’re trying to achieve in establishing
the command climate, the effect we’re trying to achieve in ensuring that we
have bystander training and bystander intervention, the effect that we’re
trying to achieve to ensure that all Marines are treated with dignity and
respect, the results that we expect out of all of that and the results we
expect from decisive leadership, is that we won’t have sexual assaults in the
United States Marine Corps,” he said, “and I think that’s when we'll be
satisfied.”
No comments:
Post a Comment