By Jim Garamone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity
WASHINGTON, Nov. 13, 2014 – The campaign against the Islamic
State of Iraq and the Levant is just entering its fourth month, and the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff urged Congress and the American people to
develop the strategic patience needed to see the effort through.
Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey and Defense Secretary Chuck
Hagel testified before the House Armed Service Committee this morning on the
progress of the campaign. Dempsey stressed the effort against ISIL is “Iraq
first,” not “Iraq only.”
“Broadly, our strategy is to reinforce a credible partner in
the Iraqi government and assist regional stakeholders to address the 20 million
disenfranchised Sunnis who live between Damascus and Baghdad,” Dempsey told the
committee. “They have to reject ISIL’s radical ideology from within.”
Squeezing ISIL
The campaign calls on Iraqis and the anti-ISIL coalition to
squeeze the extremists from multiple directions, Dempsey said. The coalition
must take on ISIL inside Iraq. It must deny the group safe haven inside Syria.
“We need to take a long view,” the chairman said.
Many lines of effort must proceed apace including
“counter-financing, counter-foreign fighter flow, counter-messaging,
humanitarian aid, economic progress, the air campaign, restoring an offensive
capability within the Iraqi Security Forces, and a ground campaign managed by
the Iraqi Security Forces from the south and the Peshmerga from the north, with
contribution from the tribes in particular in al-Anbar and Nineveh,” he said.
And the Iraqis and coalition must be flexible. The chairman
said he would recommend to President Barack Obama to use American ground forces
if the situation warrants it -- a situation he does not foresee now.
When pressed about this Dempsey said there are certain operations
that could be more complex than the ones in which the Iraqi security forces are
currently involved, that might require U.S. forces on the ground with Iraqi
troops.
Iraqi Forces ‘Doing a Better Job’
Iraqi forces are “doing a better job, and soon I think we
will be able to describe it as a good job in al Anbar and moving north out of
Baghdad and the [Kurdish Peshmerga] moving south,” the chairman said.
But there are some places along these lines of operation
with “fairly complex terrain,” including Mosul and the effort to restore the
border between Iraq and Syria, he said.
“I’m not predicting at this point that those forces in Mosul
and along the border would need to be accompanied by U.S. forces, but we’re
certainly considering it,” the chairman said.
Dempsey said there are two strategies involved in defeating
ISIL. The first is for the United States to “take ownership” of the fight and
then gradually transition responsibility to Iraqi and Peshmerga forces. The
second is from the beginning to enable Iraqi and Kurdish forces and then hold
them accountable for results, he said.
‘Modest’ U.S. Footprint in Iraq
The president has ordered the second choice. “So we’ve
established a modest footprint,” Dempsey said. U.S. forces in Iraq are focused
on the development of security forces, assisting those forces with planning and
integration of fires along with advising and assisting them from higher
headquarters.
“Any expansion of that I’d think would be equally modest,”
he said. “I just don’t see it in our interest to take this fight on ourselves
with a large military contingent.”
There could be exceptions and these could happen if the
basic assumptions the United States uses prove wrong. One of the assumptions is
the government of Iraq will be inclusive; another is that the ISF will be
willing to take back Anbar province and Ninewah province. “If those assumptions
are rendered invalid, I will have to adjust my recommendations,” Dempsey said.
Coalition Partners Agree on Strategy
Coalition partners agree with this strategy, the chairman
said. “There’s a strong commitment to work together closely in this complex and
long-term undertaking,” he said.
“Progress will be uneven at times,” the chairman added. “But
with strategic patience, the trend lines favor the coalition over the long
term.”
Dempsey called on Congress to do its part. Under the
constitution, Congress has the duty to “raise and support” the military.
“Our commitments across the globe -- as you know -- are up.
Resources are down,” he said. “And to add to that, sequestration is only months
away.
“Every day that we don’t have budget certainty and
flexibility means more time and money to regain readiness,” he continued. “And,
over time, I will have fewer military options to offer.”
No comments:
Post a Comment