By
Jim Garamone DoD News, Defense Media Activity
FORT
BELVOIR, Va., Oct. 25, 2017 — Marine Corps Gen. Joe Dunford said the meeting
here of more than 70 chiefs of defense at the Counter-Violent Extremist
Organization Conference was a historic occasion.
The
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff hosted the meeting so the chiefs could
chart the progress in the struggle against violent extremists and look at ways
to improve the strategies in the long war against the terrorists.
Dunford;
Brett McGurk, the president’s special envoy for the global coalition to defeat
ISIS; and Australian Army Col. David Kelly, an exchange officer on assignment
to the Joint Staff, spoke to the press following the conference.
During
the meeting, the senior leaders from every part of the globe looked at the
threats posed by extremist groups and examined strategies and tactics to combat
them, the chairman said. The chiefs concluded “that we are dealing with a
transregional threat and it is going to require more effective collective
action by nations that are affected,” Dunford said.
Wide-Ranging
Threat
He
noted that in Iraq and Syria the coalition saw more than 40,000 foreign
fighters from 120 different countries. The chairman added that figure describes
the range of the threat in a nutshell.
The
chiefs spoke mostly about the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, Dunford said,
because they regard ISIS as the most virulent example of violent extremism in
the world today. Still, he added, they envision the military network that has
been built to combat ISIS will also deal with other transregional extremist
threats as they arise.
The
key takeaway from the conference is that “the most effective action against
these groups is local action, but local action has to be informed by the nature
of the trans-regional aspect and so cooperation globally is important,” the
chairman said. But, he noted, global actions must be informed by local actions.
Connections
Violent
extremists are connected by three things that Dunford calls the “connective
tissue” of terrorism: foreign fighters, finances and the narrative. Cutting the
connectivity between these groups is key to defeating them, the general said.
Doing this will enable local forces to deal with the challenges posed by these
groups, he said.
One
example is the five-month battle for Marawi in the Philippines, which the
chiefs were briefed about yesterday, Dunford said. About 30 foreign fighters
returned to the Mindanao region after fighting with ISIS and persuaded local
extremist groups to pledge to ISIS and launch attacks in the city. “Small
numbers of ISIS leaders are attempting to leverage local insurgencies,” the
chairman said.
The
coalition is seeing something similar in Africa, he said, where a number of
local insurgencies rebranded themselves and pledged allegiance to ISIS.
The
chiefs discussed the movement of these individuals and the need for
intelligence- and information-sharing within the coalition to stop them,
Dunford said.
Global
Effort, Global Approach
McGurk
helps coordinate the whole-of-government approach to the campaign against
violent extremism. He said the chiefs spoke a great deal during the meeting
about all the efforts against ISIS, including the stabilization and
humanitarian programs that are included in every military campaign. He also
said foreign fighters trying to get into or out of Iraq and Syria has come to a
near halt. “We believe we’ve cut their revenue down to the lowest level ever,”
he said.
“Most
interestingly today, we did a little walk around the globe, because it is not
just about Iraq and Syria,” McGurk said. “We had very detailed presentations of
operations against ISIS in Marawi, in the Sahel, we talked about how we are tracking
foreign fighters around the world … and we had a very good presentation from
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia about the leading efforts that they have taken on
to counter the narrative and leading the counter-messaging campaign in that
part of the world.”
The
chairman said the campaign against ISIS is at an “inflection point” and that
all the chiefs discussed what’s next. “One of the points that was made several
times today is the need for the coalition to stay focused on Iraq and Syria for
an enduring period of time,” Dunford said.
Counter-Messaging
Defeating
the narrative of the terror groups is one of the toughest nuts to crack, he
said, but progress is being made. “I’m not complacent, but I am encouraged by
how the success on the ground in translated into undermining the credibility of
the narrative,” the chairman said. “There have been some studies of young
people who are radicalized and those numbers seem to go down. There are
certainly indicators that fewer young people are being radicalized, and that’s
as a result of us being able to demonstrate what ISIS is. They can only behead
so many people and treat people they way they did in Mosul and Raqqa before
those stories came out.”
The
Saudi counter-ISIS messaging effort now has 41 nations involved. “Clearly,
credible Islamic voices are going to be the ones that matter most in countering
the narrative of ISIS, and countering it and discrediting it for what it is,”
he said.
With
75 nations and entities such as NATO and the African Union Mission in Somalia,
there are some who think the coalition is too big, Kelly said. But the
coalition thrives on the diversity of views the coalition offers, he noted.
“What
I bring to the Joint Staff, I feel, is a diversity of perspective,” the colonel
said. “It’s that diversity of perspective that we are looking for in our
planning. Can [the coalition] become too big? I don’t think so. I think the
price of admission is wanting to be a part of solving the problem.”
The
coalition is not a formal alliance, nor does any nation want it to be one,
Dunford said. It all comes down to helping local and regional forces handle
their security problems, and sharing information and intelligence to sever the
connective tissue and defeat the narrative. “The bigger the coalition is, the
better,” the chairman said.
No comments:
Post a Comment