By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service
ABOARD A U.S. MILITARY AIRCRAFT – The
NATO chiefs of defense had a good discussion on events in Afghanistan and
alliance plans in the region, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, said today.
Dempsey spoke aboard a C-40 aircraft
taking him from Sibiu, Romania -- where the NATO Military Committee met -- to
Ankara, Turkey.
The meeting was the first for the chiefs
of defense since the Chicago Summit where alliance heads of state approved the
NATO Strategic Plan for Afghanistan. The plan includes how the alliance will
remain engaged in the country post-December 2014, when the NATO International
Security Assistance Force mission ends.
ISAF commander Marine Corps Gen. John R.
Allen briefed the chiefs via video-teleconference. “He briefed on the campaign
as well as his thinking of the timing of future decisions on things like the
enduring presence and the rate at which the [NATO] forces will decline,”
Dempsey said.
“This meeting was to validate the way
ahead for the decisions to be made,” he said. Each nation will review its
commitments, and the political leaders will decide how best to move forward.
It is important to note that the United
States is not yet finished recovering the surge forces, which will happen by
the end of this month. At that point, Allen will present his semi-annual
campaign review.
“After the review and following the
decisions made in Chicago, the analysis will be brought forward,” Dempsey said.
“Sometime by the end of the year, I would expect, we would begin to have an
idea of what our post-2014 presence [in Afghanistan] will be.”
With that information, Allen said he can
make plans to get from 68,000 U.S. forces to the number needed on January 1,
2015.
The chiefs also discussed insider
attacks -- where Afghan security forces, or those disguised as security forces,
fire on coalition troops. There was another instance of that yesterday when a
member of the Afghan Local Police allegedly killed two British soldiers.
“We’re all seized with [the insider
attack] problem,” Dempsey said. “You can’t whitewash it. We can’t convince
ourselves that we just have to work harder to get through it. Something has to
change.”
Commanders in Afghanistan are doing all
they can to reduce the problem -- vetting, counterintelligence agents in the
force, a guardian angel program or changing the posture of the force.
“But we’ve got to make sure our Afghan
counterparts are as seized about it as we are,” Dempsey said. “We have to get
on top of this. It is a very serious threat to the campaign.”
The attack on Camp Bastion in Helmand
province was not an example of an insider attack, Dempsey said.
“We pulled the intelligence string -- we
and the Brits -- and the initial assessment is that it was a breach of the
perimeter and there is no indication at this point that it was aided by anyone
inside,” he said. “It’s really too soon to tell. We certainly need to continue
to examine that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment